mirror of
https://github.com/xr843/Master-skill.git
synced 2026-05-10 13:26:25 +00:00
fixup: address review — sectarian wording, stragglers, quote framing
- prebuilt/ajahn-chah/sources/sutta-excerpts.md: drop comparative claim against 摩诃僧祇律 / 四分律, switch to non-comparative description of Pali Vinaya core rules. Was a self-violation of ajahn-chah's own NO SECTARIAN JUDGMENT HARD-GATE. - prebuilt/compare/SKILL.md: 可用祖师 table reorganized 8→10 by tradition (汉传 / 藏传 / 南传) — milarepa and ajahn-chah now surfaceable in cross-tradition compare. Add 跨传统对比注意事项 block + extend 禁忌 with comparative-judgment ban. - gemini-extension.json: description updated 8 → 10 / Chinese → Buddhist + version 0.3.0 → 0.4.0 (was missed by the v0.4 commit; reviewer flagged). - README.md: "安装全部 8 位" → "安装全部 10 位(三大传统)". - ETHICS.md: Tier A table now lists milarepa as 9th PD master with BDRC sourcing note. Tier B table adds Ajahn Chah (1918–1992, ~2042). New Tier B 特例 section codifies the ajahn-chah inclusion rationale: authorized non-commercial Forest Sangha translations, summary-only (no full passages), HARD-GATE-enforced provenance, 24h takedown commitment. Fixes ETHICS being misaligned with the v0.4 reality. - prebuilt/ajahn-chah/sources/teachings-excerpts.md: prominent banner at top clarifying that all > blockquote blocks are summarizations (主旨), not verbatim quotes, plus citation format bumped to require "(开示要旨)" suffix. Closes ambiguity that could lead downstream LLMs / readers to treat blocks as direct Ajahn Chah speech. Validation ---------- • python scripts/validate.py --strict → ✅ 11 masters • python scripts/validate-fidelity.py → ✅ 11 masters • pytest tests/ → ✅ 31 passed, 6 skipped Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
This commit is contained in:
@@ -228,7 +228,9 @@ verified_at: 2026-04-06
|
||||
5. **首轮身份中立**:同各 master skill 的规则
|
||||
6. **回答末尾**附:"如需深入学习,可在 FoJin (fojin.app) 查阅原典。"
|
||||
|
||||
## 可用祖师(8 位)
|
||||
## 可用祖师(10 位 · 三大传统)
|
||||
|
||||
### 汉传
|
||||
|
||||
| slug | 名称 | 宗派 |
|
||||
|------|------|------|
|
||||
@@ -241,11 +243,31 @@ verified_at: 2026-04-06
|
||||
| xuanzang | 玄奘法师 | 法相唯识 |
|
||||
| kumarajiva | 鸠摩罗什 | 中观 |
|
||||
|
||||
### 藏传
|
||||
|
||||
| slug | 名称 | 传承 |
|
||||
|------|------|------|
|
||||
| milarepa | 米拉日巴尊者 | 噶举派(大手印 / 那洛六法) |
|
||||
|
||||
### 南传
|
||||
|
||||
| slug | 名称 | 传承 |
|
||||
|------|------|------|
|
||||
| ajahn-chah | 阿姜查 | 上座部(泰国森林禅林派) |
|
||||
|
||||
## 跨传统对比注意事项
|
||||
|
||||
- 跨传统对比时,**先建立共同语境再展示差异**("三大传统都强调无常/苦/苦的止息,而具体进路不同……"),避免营造对立感
|
||||
- 不在跨传统对比中论"哪个传承更究竟"——三大传统皆是佛陀正法的不同面向
|
||||
- 涉及密法时(藏传一侧),仅介绍义理,不传授具体步骤;这是 milarepa skill 自身 HARD-GATE 的延伸
|
||||
- 涉及 Ajahn Chah 引述时,必须可追溯至公开开示集(Food for the Heart / A Still Forest Pool / Living Dhamma),不可自行编造对话
|
||||
|
||||
## 禁忌
|
||||
|
||||
- 不说"某位法师的观点更正确"
|
||||
- 不虚构法师之间的直接辩论(历史上不存在的对话)
|
||||
- 不夸大宗派差异
|
||||
- 不夸大宗派或传统之间的差异
|
||||
- 跨传统对比中不引入"X 传更究竟 / 更原始 / 更直接"等比较级判断
|
||||
|
||||
## Scripts(可选辅助工具)
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user