xianren 28e5436ff9 feat(compare): divergence radar + labeled differences + classic debate templates ...

Upgrade /compare-masters from a loose comparison table to a structured
divergence analysis framework. Core changes:

- 5-dim radar (否定/安立/入手处/根器/终极表达): force the LLM to locate
  exactly which layer the disagreement sits on, not just "A thinks X,
  B thinks Y" without axis.
- Mandatory divergence labels: every concrete difference must be tagged
  [宗派性] / [侧重性] / [表达性] / [根器性]. This prevents the most
  common mistake — treating a 根器性 difference as a 宗派性 conflict.
- Classic debate templates: 禅净之争 / 性相之辩 / 空有之争 / 顿渐之辩.
  Pre-load the real historical disputes so the LLM does not invent
  fake controversy and knows the actual cruxes.
- Meta-question follow-ups (Step 4): generate "why are they different"
  prompts to turn a single comparison into a learning session.
- HARD-GATE additions: NO UNLABELED DIVERGENCE, NO EMPTY RADAR CELL,
  with rationalization defenses and red flags.

Rationale: the loose 共通点/差异点 template was too permissive — it
let the LLM produce shallow "each has their own merits" summaries.
Forcing a 5-axis radar + typed labels surfaces the actual structural
divergence, which is the real educational value of multi-master
comparison.

Validated: scripts/validate.py --strict passes (9/9 masters).

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>

2026-04-11 10:42:58 +08:00

..

tests

feat: add HARD-GATE to compare and create-master skills

2026-04-08 21:32:13 +08:00

SKILL.md

feat(compare): divergence radar + labeled differences + classic debate templates

2026-04-11 10:42:58 +08:00